“How the World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind”

October 30, 2007 at 10:22 am (culture, faith, philosophy, religion) (, , , )

I have been looking forward to former atheist Anthony Flew’s new book about his switch to theism. It just came out (Amazon dates it Oct. 23). It is called “There Is a God: How the World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind.” I just ordered it from or here.
Of course, you can also get the book from Amazon

From Publishers Weekly:

British philosopher Flew has long been something of an evangelist for atheism, debating theologians and pastors in front of enormous crowds. In 2004, breathless news reports announced that the nonagenarian had changed his mind. This book tells why.

I read his interview with Gary Habermas afew years ago, and I have been waitng for the book ever since.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Why do you believe?

October 23, 2007 at 1:09 pm (faith) ()

I have been struggling with my faith lately, and am asking for some help.

Why do you believe? I would be grateful if you would take a moment to post a comment here briefly explaining why you believe in Jesus Christ. Also, if you would, please describe your degree of certainty: are you 100% sure, 99% sure, etc.

Permalink 1 Comment

The Parable of the Clockwork Fairy

October 18, 2007 at 11:28 am (8862, faith, philosophy, religion, science) (, , )

There once was a hardworking man who, returning home from a journey, found a small package by his door. It was wonderfully wrapped in paper that glittered like the night sky in January, with a ribbon like a belt of silver. The weary man picked up the box and brought it inside his house. He kindled a fire in the fireplace and sat down to open the box by the glow of the fire.

He took care not to tear the strange paper or ribbon, and gently pried open the wooden box. He reached into the box and removed a small metal object, which shone brightly in the firelight. he started as it suddenly lept from his hand and took flight, fluttering around his chair, flashing like a firefly.

Amazed, he tried to follow it long enough to examine it, but it was moving too quickly. He tried to catch it with his hands, but then refrained, afraid that he would break it, whatever it was.

After some time, the thing settled down, alighting on the back of his chair. He leaned over and looked closely at the strange gift. It was shaped like a tiny winged lady, with clothes of feathers and leaves, but it appeared to be made all of silver. It was intricately designed, he could see. It was beautiful to look at, and filled him with a feeling of awe and wonder, and at the same time, a feeling of peace and tranquility, of general wellness and wholeness.

He gently lifted it off of the chair, and set it on his nightstand, for it was late and time for bed. As he drifted off to sleep, he wondered who it was that sent him such a strange and wonderful gift.

The next day, the man carefully set the silver fairy in its box before he left for work. After all, he didn’t want it flying about while he was gone, or worse, flying out the window. All day at work, he could think of nothing else, so strange a spell had this thing cast on him, or so it seemed to him. At home again, he opened the box with anticipation and joyously watched the tiny sprite flutter about, as if it danced about his head like a dream. It seemed to have a mind of its own.

Each day was the same, and he found that the fairy had given a sense of wholeness to his life, a joy and purpose. It was strange, but true. And every day he released it when he returned home, and enjoyed its company more than any man his wife or dear friend.

As time went on, however, he began to wonder more and more about where it came from, and about how it worked, and what it was. One night, as he watched it fly if front of the fire, the thought came into his head that he should see what was inside of the thing. He was repulsed by this thought, and put it out of his mind. But each day, he kept wondering, and the temptation to know gradually became overwhelming.

Finally one night, he gently lifted the fairy out of her box and placed it on the table. He picked up a knife and searched the bright surface of the fairy for some seam into which he might pry. He inserted the tip of the blade right under the joint where the wing met the back, and gently twisted, for he feared breaking the thing.

The the tiny lady yielded, and her back opened to reveal a wondrous array of clockwork, glittering like a tiny dragon’s hoard inside of the silver shell. He grabbed his spectacles and peared inside. The gears and springs were almost too small to see. He gently poked and proded, for now he wanted to know just how it worked. He meticulously traced the network of gears and springs and levers from the wings to the delicate mechanism inside. At last, and now it was late at night, he had succeeded, he thought in discovering the precise mechanism that made the lady fly. He had even drawn a detailed diagram of the mechanism.

Satisified that he had mastered the secret of the gift, he set to work putting it back together. He had all of the parts in order, numbered and meticulously labelled, and he carefully lifted the first small cog from the table to put it in its place in the shiny shell. But as he did, as the lilliputian gear lay on his upturned fingertip, it suddenly turned to dust. The gray powder slid down his calloused skin and onto the table. He watched helplessly as the rest of the parts, one by one, disintegrated, leaving tiny piles of gray dust. Before he could think, the wind blew open the door, and a breeze swept the dust from his table, and out the open window.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Two Options

October 15, 2007 at 7:04 pm (faith, philosophy, religion) (, , , )

We have two options. I can see no more.

One option is that there is no God, or no personal God, in which case Nietzsche’s madman was right:

Have you not heard of that madman who lit a lantern in the bright morning hours, ran to the market place, and cried incessantly: “I seek God! I seek God!”—As many of those who did not believe in God were standing around just then, he provoked much laughter. Has he got lost? asked one. Did he lose his way like a child? asked another. Or is he hiding? Is he afraid of us? Has he gone on a voyage? emigrated?—Thus they yelled and laughed

The madman jumped into their midst and pierced them with his eyes. “Whither is God?” he cried; “I will tell you. We have killed him—you and I. All of us are his murderers. But how did we do this? How could we drink up the sea? Who gave us the sponge to wipe away the entire horizon? What were we doing when we unchained this earth from its sun? Whither is it moving now? Whither are we moving? Away from all suns? Are we not plunging continually? Backward, sideward, forward, in all directions? Is there still any up or down? Are we not straying, as through an infinite nothing? Do we not feel the breath of empty space? Has it not become colder? Is not night continually closing in on us? Do we not need to light lanterns in the morning?

But much like our culture, the people of Nietzsche’s parable did not recognize their dire circumstance:

Here the madman fell silent and looked again at his listeners; and they, too, were silent and stared at him in astonishment. At last he threw his lantern on the ground, and it broke into pieces and went out. “I have come too early,” he said then; “my time is not yet. This tremendous event is still on its way, still wandering; it has not yet reached the ears of men. Lightning and thunder require time; the light of the stars requires time; deeds, though done, still require time to be seen and heard. This deed is still more distant from them than most distant stars—and yet they have done it themselves.

Our culture does not recognize it, but I think the consequences of “the deed” are even are upon us. “Has it not become colder?” Yes, like Sartre’s nausea. “Are we not plunging…?” Yes, into blackness and darkness and nothingness.

But we have a second option: There is a pesonal God, and life has purpose and meaning.

(Source of the Nietzsche quotes: Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science (1882, 1887) para. 125; Walter Kaufmann ed. (New York: Vintage, 1974), pp.181-82.; quoted in the Internet Modern History Sourcebook)

Permalink Leave a Comment

Moral Midnight

October 14, 2007 at 7:55 pm (faith, philosophy, religion, science) (, , , , )

10_14_07-039.jpg
In 1947, the Board of Directors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists at the University of Chicago started the so-called “Doomsday Clock“. The idea is that they move it closer to midnight when world developments seem to be moving closer to the destruction of the world by nuclear war or other destructive technologies or environmental degradation.

I think we need a moral/spiritual version of the Doomsday Clock, one that indicates how close we are to the destruction of civilization that results from moral and spiritual decay. I guess first we must define midnight. I thought one good definition could be found in Genesis 6:5, just before God destroyed the earth in Noak’s day: “Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually(Gen 6:5 NASB).” Another good definition would be in Romans 1:28-32:

And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them (NASB).

Based on these definitions of midnight, I think I’ll put the clock at 11:55.

Permalink Leave a Comment

A Parable of a Ruler

October 12, 2007 at 1:50 pm (8862, faith, philosophy, religion, science) (, , , )

Once upon a time there was a ruler, a wooden measuring stick. This ruler was carefully wrought by an ingenius woodworker, whose shop was filled with his meticulous creations. The old artisan built everything himself, the building, the tools, and the fruniture. The day he made the ruler, he set it down on the counter and left to the city for supplies.

Magically, the ruler awoke and came to life. This was a strange experience, to be sudenly conscious and alive, and the ruler looked around in astonishment and confusion at the shop, and immediately began searching for answers. How did he get here? Who was he? Where was he?

Being a ruler, of course, he immediately began to go about the shop measuring everything, and observing, seeking to understand his situation. As he did, he began to notice that everything in the shop seemed to have certain things in common. All of the handles on the tools were of the same basic shape and the same size. All of the furniture had a common theme. He was amazed to find that everything in the shop matched exactly with some increment on his graduated side. Everything had a length, width, height, or diameter that corresponded to one of the numbered lines along the length of his body. There were mathematical relationships among all of the things in the shop.

Before long, he had devised elaborate equations to describe the relationships between all of the lengths and widths, and diameters in the shop. These equations explained everything, he thought, even himself. He fit into the equations.

“So that is it,” he thought, “this is why I am here.”

Permalink 2 Comments

Red Eft

October 7, 2007 at 8:04 am (8862, faith, philosophy, religion, science) (, , , , , , , )

Here is a picture of a beautiful red eft, a stage in the life cycle of the eastern newt. This picture was taken last summer at the top of Mt. Monadnock in southern New Hampshire by the side of a pool of water in the granite.

What is it about we humans that attrcats us to such things? Why are we attracted to such beauty? Things like this seem to speak to something deep within us. They seem to speak of something larger and deeper than scientific descriptions. Awe and wonder. The sublime.

No, says the naturalistic scientist or philosopher, these feelings are just chemical reactions in your cells, reactions that create the illusion of something more, something more than atoims and molecules and electromagnetism. But that is all they are, says the stoic scientist. Feelings of awe and wonder at sublime beauty are nothing more than chemistry molded and shaped by millions of years of purposeless physical processes. Go ahead and imagine that there is something more if that pleases you.

But what if there is something more? What if these feelings are not just tricks that evolution has played on us?

A Red Eft

Permalink 2 Comments

Chaucer and Changing Priorities

October 7, 2007 at 7:50 am (8862, faith, philosophy, religion) (, , , , , )

A character in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales tells a story of an ancient knight who had a beautiful daughter whose beauty was exceeded only by her own chastity, gentleness and virtue. On day, as she walked through the market, she caught the eye of a lecherous and corrupt judge, who immediately set his heart on having her for his physical pleasure. He arranged for another criminal to bring a false charge to the court against the noble knight.

On the appointed day, this false witness came to the court. He claimed that the noble knight had stolen his slave girl at birth and that the girl was not his daughter at all. Though the knight brought many reputable witnesses on his behalf, and each in his turn testified and gave evidence that the girl was the knight’s offspring, yet the evil judge ruled against the poor knight. This judge ordered that the girl be brought to the court and placed under his care.

The sad knight returned home and called his daughter. He told her of the evil man’s scheme and the court order. With a heavy heart, he told her that she must die rather than be dishonored by the lecherous judge. Though she fainted from despair, yet the noble girl agreed, and asked only that her father use his expertise to make her death quick. She then fainted again, and as she lay there on the floor, the poor knight drew his sword and beheaded his beautiful daughter.

He brought her head to the judge, and when the people saw it, they rose up against the judge, tortured him, and finally hanged him and his accomplices.

This is a tragic story, and I do not agree with the knight’s actions, but I post it because of what it says about our modern culture. How far we have come! We have come so far from the values of the ancients! We do not value virtue at all.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Hypocrisy

October 4, 2007 at 7:32 pm (faith, philosophy, religion, science) (, , , , , )

Whenever someone in the public eye is caught in some indecency or tresspass, and that person happens to have expressed any traditional moral views on some prior date, then we hear the cries of “hypocrisy”. But is this hypocrisy? Is it hypocrisy if a man decries the evil of some sin and is later caught therein?

If I do things that I think are morally wrong, does that make me a hypocrite? If so, then we should all be hypocrites, or else none of us have a conscience. We should all of us admit that we are hypocrites, since we all sin against God and conscience, or else we have no God or conscience. Is the addict a hypocrite when he curses his addiction and longs to be free? Is the criminal a hypocrite when he feels his guilt? Is every man a hypocrite who ever goes against what he knows to be right?

Let’s go one step further. If I do things that I say are morally wrong, does that make me a hypocrite? If so, then we had better make ourselves hypocrites, or else watch our morality roll downhill, as I discussed in “The Check Valve of Society”. If none can say that anything that they do or have done is wrong, then will we see the moral standards of the society decline, because man errs continually, and so must continually add to the list of things that cannot be identified as wrong. he must lengthen the list of the acceptable. In fact we have seen this and are now watching helplessly as it happens around us.

If, however, hypocrisy means making myself seem that which I am not, then it is OK to call wrong “wrong” even if I am a perpetrator, because I can admit that I am a perpetrator and yet own my guilt. I can acknowlege my guilt and yet acknowlege the standard, because the standard is outside of myself. I do not determine the standard, and my failure does not affect it. I can point to the standard as long as I “point the finger” at myself.

Permalink 1 Comment

Meant to Live

October 1, 2007 at 7:44 pm (faith, philosophy, religion, science) (, , , , )

“If I find in myself desires which nothing in this world can satisfy, the only
logical explanation is that I was made for another world.”

— C.S. Lewis

I found this quote this evening. I had to post it with this song by Switchfoot.

If blind chance and physics made us thus, then life is absurd. Reality doesn’t fit with appearance. Man is an illusion. It would be a cruel joke were it not a meaningless impersonal event. It would be a mockery if the universe were a person.

But if God made us thus, then we are meant for something greater than the universe.

See “Intelligently Designed” for previous, similar thoughts.

Permalink 1 Comment